Back to list

Don't rush to "master" skills in just an hour

Why our obsession with speed learning is hurting us. In an era of AI and instant gratification, true mastery still requires time, patience, and depth.

Don't rush to "master" skills in just an hour

Don't rush to "master" skills in just an hour

Ever since AI went mainstream, my social feeds are flooded with these "speedrun" success stories - "Built an app in 24 hours!", "Zero to full-stack developer in just 2 weeks!, "How I wrote a bestselling novel in a weekend!” Everyone seems obsessed with cramming their achievements into these impossibly attractive timeframes.

Look, I get it - we're all busy and time is precious. But here's my take: should "fast learning" really be the main selling point for picking up a new skill? Are we choosing what to learn based on how quickly we can master it, rather than how valuable or meaningful it is?

What's with this obsession of mastering everything in an hour?

The Rise of "Speed Learning" Culture

Social media's algorithm-driven nature plays a perfect accomplice in this speed-obsessed narrative. These platforms thrive on quick wins and instant results - the faster and more dramatic the transformation, the more likely it is to go viral. Every share, every like, every "This is mind-blowing! 🤯" comment further cements the idea that if you're not learning at lightning speed, you're somehow falling behind.

And then there's AI, the ultimate accelerant to this already blazing fire. Tools like ChatGPT, Midjourney, and countless AI coding assistants have undeniably transformed what's possible in a short timeframe. They've democratized access to certain skills, absolutely. But they've also created this peculiar expectation that everything should be achievable in record time.

Think about it: when was the last time you saw a viral post about someone taking their time to master a craft? About the joy of slow learning, of making mistakes, of the messy middle part of any journey? These stories exist, but they're drowned out by the thunderous chorus of "faster, quicker, now!"

The irony isn't lost here - we're using AI to accelerate our learning about AI, creating this perpetual cycle of acceleration. It's like we're caught in a speed trap of our own making, where the destination has become less important than how quickly we can get there.

The culture of speed learning isn't inherently bad - it's opened doors for many who couldn't afford traditional, time-intensive education paths. But perhaps it's time we asked ourselves: Are we running so fast that we've forgotten where we're going? And what happens when we finally get there, out of breath and wondering if we absorbed anything meaningful along the way?

Behind the Rush

We're pattern-seeking creatures who love efficiency - it's how we survived as a species. When someone dangles the possibility of achieving in hours what traditionally takes years, it's like offering water to someone in a desert. Of course we're going to reach for it. Who wouldn't?

But there's a darker undercurrent here, one that's uniquely amplified by our digital age: FOMO - the Fear of Missing Out. Every time we open our phones, we're bombarded with success stories that seem to be moving at warp speed. "Another 22-year-old millionaire?" "Someone else learned quantum computing over a weekend?"

The highlight reel never stops, and with each scroll, the anxiety builds.

"What if this is my last chance to jump on the AI bandwagon?"

"Am I already too late to the party?"

"If everyone else is learning this fast, will I become obsolete?"

These aren't just casual concerns anymore - they're keeping people up at night. The digital age has created this peculiar paradox where we have more opportunities than ever before, yet we're more afraid than ever of missing them. It's like being in an all-you-can-eat buffet but feeling like the food might vanish any second.

And then there's our relationship with instant gratification. We've become accustomed to next-day delivery, streaming on demand, and answers at our fingertips. This expectation of immediacy has seeped into how we approach learning and skill development. We're treating knowledge like we treat our Netflix shows - if we can't binge it all at once, is it even worth starting?

It's like we're all participating in a massive multiplayer game where the goal isn't mastery - it's speed-running through content. The faster you clear a level, the more social validation you receive.

But games have reset buttons; real skills and knowledge don't.

The psychology behind this rush is perfectly understandable. We're all trying to keep up in a world that seems to be accelerating exponentially. But perhaps the most radical thing we can do in this speed-obsessed era is to pause and ask: Are we running because we want to, or because we're afraid to stand still?

The Hidden Costs

First up, there's the quality-speed tradeoff that nobody wants to acknowledge. Sure, you can "learn" a programming language in a weekend by memorizing syntax and copying AI-generated code. But can you debug when things go wrong?

Can you understand why certain solutions work better than others? It's like trying to become a chef by memorizing recipes without understanding how ingredients work together. You might be able to follow instructions, but create something original? That's a different story.

The burnout is real, and it's getting worse. I'm seeing more and more people in my network hitting walls they didn't see coming. They sprint through three different boot camps in a month, jump from Python to JavaScript to Rust in weeks, only to find themselves exhausted, overwhelmed, and ironically, feeling more behind than ever.

It's the educational equivalent of crash dieting - quick results that often lead to a painful rebound.

Those viral success stories? They're often more about clever marketing than actual mastery. That "I built a successful app in 24 hours" post probably isn't mentioning the years of coding experience that made that sprint possible, or the team of people helping behind the scenes, or the dozens of failed attempts before the successful one.

The most insidious cost might be what this does to our learning mindset. We're creating a generation of learners who might be great at rapid acquisition but struggle with deep understanding. They know how to speed-run through tutorials but panic when faced with novel problems that require original thinking.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: some things just take time. Not because we're slow or the methods are outdated, but because that's how deep learning works. Our brains need time to process, connect, and truly integrate new knowledge.

No AI tool or accelerated program can shortcut this fundamental aspect of human cognition.

A Better Way Forward

When did "how fast did you learn it" become more important than "how well do you understand it"? It's like we're judging a chef by how quickly they can make a dish rather than how good it tastes.

Instead of "time to completion," what about "depth of understanding"? Next time you're tempted by a "learn X in 24 hours" promise, ask yourself:

What do I really want to achieve with this skill?

Am I learning for the badge, or for the understanding?

Will this quick sprint serve my long-term goals?

Because at the end of the day, true mastery isn't a sprint - it's a thoughtful journey.

Let's make peace with the fact that some things take time, and that's not just okay - it's valuable. In our rush to learn everything, let's not forget to learn it well.

After all, in the race between the tortoise and the hare, we all know who won - and it wasn't the one bragging about their speed run.